30-Minute Meetings Are a Scam


Really, most meetings should be 15 minutes, 45 minutes, or an hour long.1

In my (admittedly limited) experience, things that require meetings mostly fall into three categories:

What 30 minute meetings are actually good for:

30 minutes is also the appropriate amount length of time to book 1 on 1 meetings with your boss for, despite the fact that if your boss is busy they will be late, and you will probably only get 15 minutes with them, and if they have time (unlikely), you might get more like 40 minutes with them. Do you see my point?

The problem is that scheduling 15 or 45 minutes feels weird, so no one does it, and people are reticent to schedule hour-long meetings, because it feels like you’re taking up too much of people’s time.

Everything else really falls into the following categories:

Here’s one fun heuristic I learned from one of my colleagues: if you’re ever in a meeting that feels pointless to you and you’re not even sure why you’re there, figure out how much money each person is making for the duration of that meeting. That’s the cost of this meeting. Now, sum up the amount of money being made by everyone who doesn’t need to be there. That’s the amount of money being wasted by this meeting.

Now, here are some anecdotes from my professional life:

Obviously, I am a sample size of one. Your mileage may vary.

On a closing note, I also think there is absolutely no reason for a meeting to last more than two hours. I don’t know if anyone can stay focused on a single topic of discussion for that long, and at the point where you’re going longer, you’re probably wasting a lot of people’s time (and by extension, the organization’s money).


  1. The exceptions, of course, are the meetings you think will take 15 minutes, but actually need 25 to 30 minutes. You know what they say about exceptions… ↩︎