<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 on rkempe’s blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.rkempe.ca/posts/2023/</link>
    <description>Recent content in 2023 on rkempe’s blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-ca</language>
    <copyright>&amp;copy; Copyright 2026 Rebecca Kempe</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 01:19:50 -0400</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.rkempe.ca/posts/2023/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>AI art isn&#39;t for artists (redux)</title>
      <link>https://blog.rkempe.ca/shorts/2023/05/ai-art-isnt-for-artists-redux/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 01:19:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.rkempe.ca/shorts/2023/05/ai-art-isnt-for-artists-redux/</guid>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;You know what the missing piece of the puzzle was? It was that AI art isn&amp;rsquo;t for artists.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Like, it can be. But for the most part it isn&amp;rsquo;t.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;rsquo;s a &amp;ldquo;thread&amp;rdquo; I wrote back in October, in the pre-ChatGPT era, right when everyone was freaking out about AI art, and I&amp;rsquo;m pulling it out again to add some commentary on which of my thoughts have shifted and which I still think are relevant.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
